Desti Candrasari, Putu Mahardika Adi Saputra


This paper applies Gravity and Malmquist index approach to investigate energy trade efficiency between Indonesia and East Asia Countries (i.e. Japan, South Korea, and China). Gravity model is employed to identify the inputs that will be used in computing the energy trade efficiency; meanwhile, Malmquist index approach to identify the energy trade efficiency by taking data from 2000-2015. One of the findings shows that the considered inputs that will be utilised are population of importer countries, Indonesian population, relative distance, and ratio of added value of industry sector towards GDP. In addition, the energy trade efficiency between Indonesia and East Asia countries from 2000 to 2015 was composed by technical change or technical/ potential change. China averagely had the highest efficiency and showed improvement like South Korea did. Japan showed, on the other hand, deterioration.


Energy, Malmquist index, Gravity model, Trade efficiency

Full Text:



Abidin, I. S. Z., Haseeb, M., Azam, M. and Islam, R. (2015). Foreign Direct Investment, Financial Development, International Trade and Energy Consumption: Panel Data Evidence from selected ASEAN Countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5(3), 841-850.

ADB. (2013). Asian Development Outlook (ADO) 2013: Asia’s Energy Challenge. Asian Development Bank.

Antweiler, W. (2007). Internal and External Distance: Gravity Depend on it!. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia

Bergeijk, P. A. G and Brakman, S. (2010). The Gravity Model in International Trade. Cambrige University Press. Cambridge.

Bergstrand, J. H., Larch, M. and Yotov, Y. (2015). Economic Integration Agreements, Border Effects, and Distance Elasticities in the Gravity Equation. European Economic Review, 78, 307-327.

Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O’Donnell, C. J. and Battese, G. E. (2005). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Springer Science and Business Media.

Darmstadter, J. (2004). Energy and Population. Resource of the Future.

DeLong, J. P. and Burger, O. (2015). Socio-economic Instability and the Scaling of Energy Use with Population Size. PLoS One. 10(6).

Deluna Jr, R. S. (2013). Trade Performance and Potential of the Phillipines: An Application of Stochastic Frontier Gravity Model. MPRA Paper No. 51667 pp 1-32.

Deluna Jr, R. S. and Edgargo, D. C. (2014). Philippine Export Efficiency and Potential: An Application of Stochastic Frontier Gravity Model. World Journal of Economic and Finance, 1 (2), 006-015.

Drysdale, P., Yiping, H. and Kaliappa, K. J. (2000). China’s Trade Efficiency: Measurement and Determinants.

EIA. (2015). Indonesia Overview-US Energy Information Administration. Accessed on: 12 April 2016.

Fare, R., Shawna G., Marry, N. and Zhongyang, Z. (1994). Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries. The American Economic Review, 84(1), 66-83.

Fried, H. O., Shelton S.S. and C.A Knox L. 1993. Measurement of Productive Efficiency : Techniques and Applications. Cary, US: Oxford University Press (US). ProQuest ebrary. Web. 30 November 2016.

Gandolfo, G. (2014). International trade and Policy 2nd edition. Springer.

Gujarati, D. N. and Porter, D. (2009). Basic Econometrics. 5th Edition. McGraw-Hill Irwin.

IJEPA. (2007). Agreement between Japan and the Republic of Indonesia for an Economic Partnerhip. . Accesed on: 27 May 2017.

IEA. (2013). South East Asia Energy Outlook. Directorate of Global Energy Economics, International Energy Agency.

IEA. (2014). South East Asia Energy Outlook. Directorate of Global Energy Economics, International Energy Agency.

Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. (2014). Peta Jalan Kebijakan Gas Bumi Nasional 2014-2030. Jakarta.

Ministry of Trade. 2016. Trade Balance. . Accessed on : 6 July 2016.

Krugman, P., Maurice O. and Marc J.M. (2012). International trade and policy 9th edition. Pearson Education.

Lamy, P. (2010). Energy, Trade, and Global Governance. Global Challenges at the Intersection of Trade, Energy and the Environment, 15-18.

Nin Pratt, A. and Bingxin Y. (2008). The total factor productivity in China and India: new measures and approaches. China Agricultural Economic Review, 1(1), 9-22.

Phoumin, H and Shigeru K. (2014). Analysis on Price Elasticity of Energy Demand in East Asia: Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications for ASEAN and East Asia. Economic Reseach Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA). ERIA Disscusion Paper Series.

Rasoulinezhad, E. and Gil S.K. (2016). A Panel Analysis of South Korea’s Trade with OPEC Member Countries: The Gravity Model Approach. Iran Economic Review, 20(2), 203-224.

Ridwan, M. and Wildan S. (2003). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penentu Perkembangan Ekspor Kayu Lapis Indonesia ke Jepang. Lintasan Ekonomi, XX(1).

Saputra, P. M. A. (2014). Technical efficiency and export performance: evidence for self-selection hypothesis from Indonesian manufacturing sector-level data. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 7 (4), 383-398.

Selinanova, Y. (2009). Challenges for International Energy Trade Regulation. Workshop Linking Energy, Climate Change, and WTO Law.

Siddique, H. M. A. and Muhammad T. M. (2015). Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, Trade and Financial Development Nexus in South Asia. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Science, 9(2), 658-682.

Tharakan, P. (2015). Summary of Indonesia’s Energy Sector Assesment. ADB Papers on Indonesia.

Tsukenawa, J. (2002). Energy Situation in East Asia and Its Impact on the Strategic Environment. NIDS Security Reports, 3, 73-96.

Viorica, E. D. (2015). Econometric Analysis of Foreign Trade Efficiency of E.U members using Gravity Equations. Procedia Economics and Finance, 20, 670-678.

World Bank. 2016. Energy and Mining. Accessed on: 1 September 2016.

Yu, S., Yanrui W., Xunpheng S. and Dandan Z. (2015). Energy Trade Efficiency and its Determinants: A Malmquist Index Approach. Energy Economics, 50, 306-314.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.