Literature Review on Theories of International Trade and Policies Behind Modern World Trade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiae.2023.011.02.6Keywords:
International trade, trade and policy, trade theories, trade, growthAbstract
Purpose
The essay aims to critically examine different theories proposed in the literature on international trade.
Design/methodology/approach
The essay is based on theoretical literature on the theories of international trade and working policies behind modern world trade globally.
Findings
The essay starts with traditional theories of international trade and an account of the mercantilist pattern of trade is provided, and comments are made on the use of simplified models in the classical theories. Significant focus is laid on the new trade theory and the use of strategic trade policies by advanced countries. A helpful supplement is provided regarding the role of FDI and technology in trade. A further effect of trade on growth is also analyzed. Theories of the 21st century are discussed with a call for models that can incorporate income inequality, political strategies, and other real-world factors.
Research limitations/ implications
The essay deals with only theoretical literature on international trade theories and policies. Findings and interpretation are subject to the theoretical development of international trade.
Originality/ value
The essay provided a critical explanation of international trade theories and tried to explain the paradigm shift in the theoretical framework of international trade.
References
Aggarwal, S. (2023). Intra-industry trade: Revisiting theory and Literature Survey. MPRA Paper No. 117182. Available at: Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/117182/
Arrow, J. K. (1962). The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing, The Review of Economic Studies, 29 (3), 155-173. Available at https://doi.org/10.2307/2295952
Bhagwati, J. (1958). Immiserizing growth: a geometrical note. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 201–05.
Brander, J. A., & Spencer, B. J. (1985). Export subsidies and international market share rivalry. Journal of International Economics, 18 (1-2), 83-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(85)90006-6
Braudel, Fernand. (1979). The Wheels of Commerce, Civilization and Capitalism 15th–18th Century.
Charbit, Y., & Arundhati V. (2002). The Political Failure of an Economic Theory: Physiocracy. Population, 57 (6), 855–883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3246619
Clifton, D. S., & Marxsen, W. B. (1984). An Empirical Investigation of the Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem. The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue Canadienne d’Economique, 17(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/134935
Ethier, W. (1984). Higher dimensional issues in trade theory. In Handbook of International Economics, ed. R. W. Jones, & P. B. Kenen, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Feenstra, Robert C. (2004). The Heckscher–Ohlin Model. Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 31–63.
Hill, Charles (2007). International Business Competing in the Global Marketplace 6th ed. McGraw-Hill.
John J. McCusker. (2001). Mercantilism and the Economic History of the Early Modern Atlantic World. Cambridge UK.
Krugman, P. (1988). Rethinking international trade. MIT Press.
Krugman, P., & Obstfeld, M. (2003). International Economics: Theory and Policy. Addison-Wesley: New York [Sixth Edition].
Leamer, Edward E. (1995). The Heckscher–Ohlin Model in Theory and Practice. Princeton Studies in International Finance. Vol. 77. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-88165-249-9.
Muller, A. L. (1978). Quesnay's Theory of Growth: A Comment, Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 30 (1), 150–156.
Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic theory and underdeveloped regions. London: Duckworth.
Nivedita S. (2018). Understanding the Role of the WTO in International Data Flows: Taking the Liberalization or the Regulatory Autonomy Path? Journal of International Economic Law, 21 (2), 323–348, https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgy021
Ohlin, Bertil (1967). Interregional and International Trade. Harvard Economic Studies. Vol. 39. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Quesnay, F. (1766). Analyse de la formule arithmétique du tableau économiqueu de la distribution des dépenses annuelles d'une Nation agricole. Journal de l'Agriculture, du Commerce et des Finances. 2(3), 11–41.
Ranjan, P., & Raychaudhuri, J. (2016). The “New-New” Trade Theory: A Review of the Literature. In: Roy, M., Sinha Roy, S. (eds) International Trade and International Finance. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2797-7_1
Ricardo, David, (1772-1823). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: John Murray, 1817.
Sen, S. (2010). International trade theory and policy: a review of the Literature. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.
Shiozawa, Y. (2017). The new theory of international values; an overview. Shiozawa, Oka, and Tabuchi (Eds.) A New Construction of Ricardian Theory of International Values, Singapore: Springer.
Singer, H. (1950). The distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. American Economic Review, [Papers and Proceedings].
Smith, Adam, (1723-1790). The Wealth of Nations / Adam Smith; Introduction by Robert Reich; Edited, with Notes, Marginal Summary, and Enlarged Index by Edwin Cannan. New York: Modern Library, 2000.
Veeramani, C. (2002). Intra-Industry Trade of India: Trends and Country-Specific Factors. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 138(3), 509–533. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40440931
Vernon, R. (1970). The technology factor in international trade. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Indonesian Applied Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
