Reader Comments

Memory Hack

by gold stone (2019-05-08)

Nevertheless, when looked at with Memory Hack Review historical perspective, risky protocols are frequently viewed later as barbaric - such as frontal lobotomies and many of the methods that were once common in self-styled modern asylums. This leaves me to conclude that several of the current methods may also eventually be considered cruel and ineffective by the practitioners only a few decades from now.Regardless, too many clinicians and theorists mistakenly regard psychology as a field of science rather than as a primitive, nascent endeavor.It is an irrefutable fact that way too much is not known about the human mind. Indeed, the neurological findings of the last couple of decades make the academic gospel formerly taught - when current psychology professors earned their degrees - questionable at best. Therefore, the field has always been one where uncertainty, philosophy, and a diverse offering of schools of theory have been shrouded in the mystique of scientific labeling. The truth is that psychotherapy without innovation and risk-taking currently would have no validity.So, consider the role of risk in the effectiveness of therapy. Therapeutic interventions exist for only one reason and that is to transform a subject's experience from one state to a more preferred one. I will avoid here any discussion regarding the definition of sanity or mental health. It suffices to say that change is desired.The problem is that there is always a resistance to change. If this could occur with little effort, there would be no need for clinicians. No change means staying in the status quo condition. However, this is where the suffering and discomfort is occurring. On the other hand, the suffering of change occurs when a person attempts transformation. For instance, an addiction may present unwanted costs. Regardless, it is a known state, a fact which ironically creates a perverse level of comfort. Change represents moving toward an unknown. This is difficult. It is painful when you consider the suffering that must occur.I have frequently written and spoken that transformation requires an antithetical condition. This means that there must be something that is so compelling that either results in more suffering than not changing or provides such a tremendous level of pleasure that the suffering of change can be overcome. When studying Erickson's case studies, I often noticed that he created such antithetical conditions. This was his aim both in the homework assignments that he gave his patients and during trancework.