Economic Develompment Strategy Through Rural Areas A Case Study in Toba Samosir, North Sumatera, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiae.2020.008.02.3Keywords:
Rural development, Economic Development, Rural Areas.Abstract
This study aims to analyze rural area development after Law No. 4, 2014, concerning villages. The new round of village development begins with the rights of recognition and the program of rural development by the Indonesian government. In this case, the village fund is the government flagship policy for village development, which considered to succeed in increasing the quality of people's lives through infrastructure, community empowerment, and the formation of rural areas. The development of rural areas is a center of growth, whereas focusing on the most developed areas in the disadvantaged region. To encourage the village economy, some policies used in rural areas by developing several villages that have different potential within locations. A method in this research is a case study that occurred over the past four years in Indonesia. In this case, the declining number of poor people become interesting. It happens because rural development, such as Ajibata, Toba Samosir, North Sumatra, Indonesia, can encourage regional development. The concept of rural areas relying on the coffee's attractiveness and coffee's processed as well as increasing the scale of coffee’s agricultural and the coffee's product value. Therefore, innovations in rural area development are significant to support regional economic development.
References
Ambrose, B. W., Fuerst, F., Mansley, N., & Wang, Z. (2019). Siza effects and economies of scale in European real estate companies. Global Finance Journal, 41, 1-17.
APEC. (November 2018). Development and Integration of Remote Areas in the APEC Region. Singapore: Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation.
Apriani, K. D., Irhamna, I. (2016). Public Responses Towards Participatory Budgeting Model in Village Development: Case Studies in Three Province in Indonesia. Journal of Political Research, 13(2), 137-148
Ayre, M., Collum, V. M., Warwick, Samson, P., Curro, a., Nettle, R., . . . Reichelt, N. (2019). Supporting and practising digital innovation with advisers in smart farming. Wageningen Journal of Life Science, 89, 1-12.
Basuki, A. T. (2012). Pengembangan Kawasan Agropolitan. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Studi Pembangunan, 13(1), 53-71.
Budianta, A. (2010). REvitalisasi Pertanian Penggerak Utama Pembangunan Kawsan Perdesaan di Indonesia. MEKTEK Journal, Vol. 12(1), 69-76.
Cang, P. Z. (2018). The Economies of Scale of Turbot Industrial Running Water Aquaculture System in China: A Case from Shangdong Province. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Vol. 18., No. 1, 167-173.
Chiangmai, C. N. (2017). Creating efficient collaboration for knowledge creation in area-based rural development. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38, 175-180.
Cho, W., Ke, J.-y. F., & Han, C. (2019). An empirical examination of the use of bargining power and its impacts on supply chain financial performance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 25(4), 100550.
Fanzo, J. (2018). The role of farming and rural development as central to our diets. Physiology & Behavior, Vol, 193, 291-297.
Gebre, T., & Berhanu, G. (2017). The mutual benefits of promoting rural-urban interdependence through linked ecosystem services. Global Ecology and Conservation, 20, 1-14.
Gouburu, P. L., & Luis, G. G.-M. (2018). The urban-rural interface as an area with characteristics of its own in urban planning: A review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 43, 157-165.
Herry, A. (2015). Kesiapan Desa Menghadapi Implementasi Undang-Undang Desa (Tinjauan Desentralisasi Fiskal dan Peningkatan Potensi Desa). Jurnal Ilmiah CIVIS, V(1), 737-751.
Ibrahim, Sri, R., & Sawaludin. (2017). Implementasi Undang-Undang No. 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa. CIVICUS: Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 5(2), 1-6.
Jamal, E. (2008). Kajian Kritis Terhadap PElaksanaan Pembangunan PErdesaan di Indonesia. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 26(2), 92-102.
Leilun. (n.d.).
Lowe, P. (2010). Enacting rural sociology: Or what are the creativity claims of the engaged sciences. Socialogia Ruralis, Vol. 50(3), 311-330
.
Lowe, P. (2010). Enacting rural sociology: Or what are the creativity claims of the engaged sciences? Sociologia Ruralis, Vol. 50, No. 3, 311-330.
Ma'rif, S. (2012). Strategi Pengembangan Perdesaan Kawasan Perdesaan, Studi Kasus: Kawasan Perbatasan Republik Indonesia-Ambenu Republik Demokratik Timor Leste. Tata Loka, 14(1), 75-89.
Marinho, Emerson, et.al. (2017). Impact of Infrastructure Expenses in Strategic Sectors for Brazilian Poverty. Economia, 18(2), 244-259.
Nygaard, K., & Keith, B. (2014). A critical assessment of the mineral country challenge: The role and implication of scale in collaborative developement. Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 235-245.
Putri, L. S. (2016). Kewenangan Desa dan Penetapan Peraturan Desa. Jurnal Legasi Indonesia, 13(02), 161-167.
Tuker, M. V., & Mehmet, N. I. (2013). Is it enough to be entrepreneurial? Enchancing the "value added" created by SMEs in Turkey through innovation. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 379-406.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Indonesian Applied Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
